[pjsip] Question about stream.c
Michael_Broughton at advanis.ca
Wed Feb 13 13:44:19 EST 2008
Benny Prijono wrote:
> On 1/27/08, Benny Prijono <bennylp at pjsip.org> wrote:
>> On 1/27/08, Benny Prijono <bennylp at pjsip.org> wrote:
>>>> 4. Thread B, still trying to lock stream->jb_mutex, segfaults because
>>>> thread A deallocated stream->jb_mutex and zeroed out the pointer.
>>>> I have been trying to follow the code and it almost looks like this is
>>>> possible. Can anyone confirm or disprove this?
>>> Hi Michael,
>>> I've got to say that the scenario looks valid, rather unfortunately. I
>>> haven't had idea on how to solve it though.
>> Forgot one thing. I just registered your report in the ticket list for
>> now: http://trac.pjsip.org/repos/ticket/460
> Just to let you know that I think I've got this fixed now. Please see
> ticket #460 URL above for more information. Thanks for the report!
Looks better than my solutions.
As far as the DTMF callback is concerned, I think that the timeout in
the acquire_call function should be enough to cover our butts. Agreed?
Michael Broughton, Advanis
Unintended Recipient & Unauthorized Use of E-Mail:
This message and attachments may contain confidential or privileged
information that is intended only for the named recipient of this
e-mail. Any unauthorized use or distribution is not permitted. If you
have received this e-mail in error, deleting the e-mail and notifying
the sender would be appreciated. Thank you.
More information about the pjsip