[pjsip] incoming call problem

[Maya Zalcberg]

Hi Vishal,
The solution in the link you provided  is referring to sipeksdk_mobile
project directly. I only use the PJSip, so i don't think that i can use
izmoto's solution. (or maybe i am missing something?)
Do you work on iPhone?

Regards,
Maya

On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Vishal Swami <vishal.s at net4.in> wrote:

>  Hi  Maya ,
>
>
>
> The solution provided by izmoto  in the discussion
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sipek/browse_thread/thread/4f511799d8354a22
>
>
>
> works for me.
>
>
>
> Hope will be helpful to you too.
>
>
>
> * *
>
> *Regards,*
>
> * *
>
> *Vishal Swami
> **--------------------------------------------------------------*
>
> *Team Leader Product **Development/ Engineering
> **Net4India** Ltd**
> **Corporate
> D-25 Sector -3 N O I D A  (INDIA)
> Phone- +91 - 120 - 4323500 (218)
> Mobile- +91 - 981- 00 -49276
> URL-**www.net4.in* <http://www.net4.in/>*
> **--------------------------------------------------------------*
>
> *[image: cid:image002.jpg at 01C9B2F4.9E5EFF40]** **Please consider your
> environmental responsibility before printing this e-mail.*
>  ------------------------------
>
> This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you
> are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you
> must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message or any
> information herein. If you have received this message in error, please
> advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank
> you for your cooperation.
>  ------------------------------
>
>
>
> *From:* pjsip-bounces at lists.pjsip.org [mailto:
> pjsip-bounces at lists.pjsip.org] *On Behalf Of *Maya Zalcberg
> *Sent:* Monday, March 08, 2010 5:26 PM
> *To:* pjsip list
> *Subject:* Re: [pjsip] incoming call problem
>
>
>
> Hi All,
> Still no luck with the incoming call.
> As I've mentioned before, the ongoing call is working fine. Therefore i
> decided to compare the logs of both conversations, and i found out that the
> differences between the two are these lines:
>
> 19:07:36.338   Master/sound  Underflow, buf_cnt=0, will generate 1 frame
>  19:07:36.362   Master/sound  Underflow, buf_cnt=0, will generate 1 frame
>  19:07:36.371   sound_port.c  EC activated
>  19:07:36.391     ec0x243e10  Underflow, buf_cnt=162, will generate 1 frame
>  19:07:36.406     ec0x243e10  Underflow, buf_cnt=162, will generate 1 frame
>  19:07:36.547   Master/sound  Underflow, buf_cnt=0, will generate 1 frame
>  19:07:36.970   strm0x879974  VAD re-enabled
>  19:07:38.151 echo_suppress.  Echo suppressor updated at t=006.550s, echo
> tail=40 msec, factor min/avg=0.026/0.001
>  19:07:50.969 echo_suppress.  Echo suppressor learning done at t=019.380s,
> tail=40 ms, factor min/avg=0.022/0.142
>
> In the outgoing call these lines appear after the state of the call was
> changed to confirmed. in the incoming call, these methods didn't get called.
>
> Maybe it can help you understand what is the problem.
>
> Regards,
> Maya
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Message sent using India’s leading Hosted Microsoft Exchange service.
> For details visit http://net4.in/hostedExchange
>
> ------------------------------
> Please consider the environment before printing.
>



-- 
Maya Zalcberg
www.zemingo.com
972523328356
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pjsip.org/pipermail/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org/attachments/20100308/e035fa86/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 843 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.pjsip.org/pipermail/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org/attachments/20100308/e035fa86/attachment-0001.jpe>